Have you ever imagined what some of the scams these criminals do to accumulate an abundant amount of cash flow for their church fraud? Well, here is a few ways they accomplish this.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Church Scams
Friday, October 30, 2009
Deception
Deception:
The links provided below will enable you to further understand that the battle between these con artists and men and women in law enforcement resembles more of a war than a battle.
Edward Murachanian Church Fraud Pastors
Take the time to do a search for “church fraud” and “church scam” and you will find that it is one of the fastest growing forms of organized crime in our country. It is basically a country club for con artists where they blend in to the community as loving Christian people. Recently in the news you have heard of many criminals who are pastors, elders and teachers who use the church as an umbrella of protection to deceive the public.
Here are some questions to ponder:
1- Why would Edward Murachanian, the pastors and elders of Fellowship Chapel try so intensely to get my Mother and I to move back to our home at 409 Dock Road West Creek NJ even though they knew the house had a “new” roof installed that was structurally unstable?
2- Why would Donna Kozlowski the principal at the
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Church Fraud 101
How were these con artists able to commit church fraud without getting caught for so many years? Its simple, do what the good churches do so nobody will ever know. Pray for people, prepare dinners for the needy, visit church members that are sick, basically do everything a good church would do. This will ensure that the church membership will grow and money will continually keep coming in. The criminals blend in and look like sincere loving Christians yet they are just conning others into believing they are.
Report church fraud to the FBI in Washington DC
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Edward Murachanian Lawyer Brick Township
Church Fraud
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Edward Murachanian Richard Maranitz
Saturday, October 24, 2009
American Civil Liberties Union

The ACLU is the foremost defender of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The ACLU has played a major role in nearly every critical civil liberties battle of the last century -- in courtrooms, in Congress and in the public arena.That proud tradition continues today. And in the midst of the government’s efforts to curtail freedom in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the ACLU has taken on an unprecedented workload and become even more important. As we work to protect rights and liberties immediately at risk in the current crisis environment, you can also count on the ACLU to continue defending core liberties that are still at risk, but that have nothing to do with national security concerns. We don’t have the luxury of putting other core issues on a back burner as we fight new battles.
We now know from long experience that we can never let our guard down when it comes to protecting fundamental rights including keeping the government out of religion, freedom of speech, the right to choose, and equal rights for lesbians and gay men.
For it is in times like these, when attention is naturally focused elsewhere, that the foes of liberty are most likely to take advantage of a climate of fear and nostalgia to push an anti-liberty agenda that has nothing to do with the concerns at hand.
FBI Color Of Law
COLOR OF LAW Civil Rights Violations
From FBI website at http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/color.htm
It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
"Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, state or federal).
Criminal acts under color of law include acts not only done by local, state, or federal officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may also be covered under color of law, if the perpetrator asserted their official status in some manner.
Color of law may include public officials who are not law enforcement officers, for example, judges and prosecutors, as well as, in some circumstances, non governmental employees who are asserting state authority, such as private security guards.
While the federal authority to investigate color of law type violations extends to any official acting under "color of law", the vast majority of the allegations are against the law enforcement community.
The average number of all federal civil rights cases initiated by the FBI from 1997 -2000 was 3513. Of those cases initiated, about 73% were allegations of color of law violations. Within the color of law allegations, about 82% were allegations of abuse of force with violence (59% of the total number of civil rights cases initiated).
The Supreme Court has had to interpret the United States Constitution to construct law regulating the actions of those in the law enforcement community. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed.
Investigative Areas
Most of the FBI's color of law investigations would fall into five broad areas:
- excessive force;
- sexual assaults;
- false arrest/fabrication of evidence;
- deprivation of property; and
- failure to keep from harm.
In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to utilize whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breath and scope of the use of force is vast. The spectrum begins with the physical presence of the official through the utilization of deadly force. While some types of force used by law enforcement may be violent by their very nature, they may be considered "reasonable," based upon the circumstances. However, violations of federal law occur where it can be shown that the force used was willfully "unreasonable" or "excessive" against individuals.
Sexual assaults by officials acting under "color of law" could happen in a variety of venues. They could occur in court scenarios, jails, and/or traffic stops to name just a few of the settings where an official might use their position of authority to coerce another individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the other if they do not comply.
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using his authority provided under the "color of law" is allowed to stop individuals and even if necessary to search them and retain their property under certain circumstances. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power that a violation of a person's civil rights might occur. An unlawful detention or an illegal confiscation of property would be examples of such an abuse of power.
An official would violate the color of law statute by fabricating evidence against or conducting a false arrest of an individual. That person's rights of due process and unreasonable seizure have been violated. In the case of deprivation of property, the official would violate the color of law statute by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining the property of another. In that case, the official has overstepped or misapplied his authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would prohibit the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
The public entrusts its law enforcement officials with protecting the community. If it is shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.
Filing a Complaint
In order to file a complaint alleging a violation of the criminal laws discussed above, you may contact your local FBI office by telephone, in writing, or in person. The following information should be provided:
- all identifying information for the victim(s);
- as much identifying information as possible for the subject(s), including position, rank, and agency employed;
- date and time of incident;
- location and time of incident;
- names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any witness(es);
- a complete chronology of events; and
- any report numbers and charges with respect to the incident.
You may also contact the United States Attorney's Office in your district, or send a written complaint to:
Criminal Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66018
Washington, D.C. 20035-6018
Investigations vary in length and although there are internal limitations, the investigation will proceed to its logical conclusion. The FBI is the investigative component of the Department of Justice. It is, therefore, not responsible for the prosecution of a case. That is the responsibility of the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., and the United States Attorney's Office within the local jurisdiction. After the FBI has completed its investigation, it forwards its findings to the United States Attorney's Office and to the Department of Justice. They then make the determination as to whether to proceed toward prosecution or not.
Civil Applications
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141, makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. This law gives DOJ the authority to seek civil remedies in cases where it is determined that law enforcement agencies have policies or practices which foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a Pattern and Practice investigation include:
Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers' actions.
Officers not providing justification or reporting incidents involving the use of force.
Lack of, or improper training of officers.
A department having a citizen complaint process which treats complainants as adversaries.
Under Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1997, DOJ has the ability to initiate civil actions against mental hospitals, retardation facilities, jails, prisons, nursing homes, and juvenile detention facilities, when there are allegations of systemic derivations of the constitutional rights of institutionalized persons.
Also see Department of Justice 8-1.000 CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
Friday, October 23, 2009
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Elder Fraud


Elder fraud is a great way to make money. Low life con artists prey on the elderly because their generation still believe they can trust those in authority including elected officials, lawyers, doctors and those who work for mobile home parks and nursing homes.